Articles:
Africa between Spielberg and Bush
01.02.08 Publication: Exame
It is a good time to be an African. Does that statement surprise you? It might if you look at the violence in
The reason why things are getting better is not just because
Mr Spielberg, however, is too exciting a figure. Let us start with George W. Bush. American presidents have developed a habit of making African tours at the end of their terms of office. By then, they cannot achieve much at home as their influence has faded and everyone’s eyes are on the campaign to succeed them. The outgoing president wants to look statesmanlike and compassionate. Bill Clinton also discovered Africa during his second term, having tried to ignore it during his first term after his military humiliation in
They are more positive, in part, for the exact reason that the White House emphasised in its media briefings before the visit. The Bush administration has been genuinely compassionate in its African policies, starting in President Bush’s first term. His special fund to help ease the problem of HIV/AIDS has spent $15 billion there since 2003, has enabled perhaps a million Africans to receive powerful AIDS drugs and has meant that
Like all overseas aid, such flows of American money also bring controversy. The focus on AIDS, say some critics, draws money and skills away from more basic health needs, including the provision of clean water and sanitation. Some of the money is undoubtedly stolen and some just enables unscrupulous African governments to spend less of their own money on health and more on palaces and weapons. Nevertheless, on balance George Bush’s programme has been beneficial, especially for
Good to be in demand
There are, however, two other reasons why life is improving for Africans which are less comfortable for President Bush. The economies of sub-Saharan
As long as demand for natural resources stays high and the supply of them is limited, this price boom will continue. It mainly enriches the elites of those African countries fortunate enough to produce resources, but some of it contributes to wider prosperity in those countries where democracy forces it to. It also, however, has become a cause of inflation in
What this boom means above all, however, is that there is now competition to be friends with African countries, to invest there and to provide aid—at least in those countries that have natural resources.
That competition brings us back to Steven Spielberg. Probably, he always suspected that it was risky to take a job advising
At that time, Mr Spielberg shrugged off the criticism. But as pressure has built up and as the killings in
Africa matters, and there is competition now both to win the favour of African leaders and to look responsible in your
As competition is a fundamental American value, President Bush can hardly complain. But it does make matters more complicated for him and for his successors. When there is competition, African leaders become less likely to listen to your lectures about how to run their economies. They become less grateful for your aid money. They may even become less interested in you when you pay them a visit. For all those reasons, the next American president is likely to be a lot quicker to pay another visit to Africa than either Bill Clinton or George Bush—and not only if his name is Barack Obama.